Forums  
CoD4Central.com

CoD4 Central Forums

Welcome guest, please login or register a free account to post on these forums. Dec 03, 2008, 07:01 PM
Registering a free account will remove ads from the forums. Please sign up today, and help contribute to the growing community. Registering only takes a minute and allows you to post on the forums, communicate with other members, advertise for your clan, start a new one, or look for one in our clan forums, submit classes, guides, and other content, and many more features!
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
« previous next »
  Print  
Author Topic: AT-AT vs. Halo Scarab  (Read 315 times)
hello im bobo
Corporal
*
Karma: 0
Posts: 30
244.00 credits (i) (?)

View Profile
« on: Oct 04, 2008, 10:36 PM »
who would win?
Logged
Hello im hello im bobo
YoGurT
Lt. General
***
Karma: 80
Posts: 1,001
5410.00 credits (i) (?)
XBL: x Yogurt


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: Oct 05, 2008, 01:56 PM »
I think the scarab because of teh lazer b34ms.
Logged
call me
YoGi

Weapon of Choice

Meet the Sniper

Go ahead, make my day
moglet99
Major General
**
Karma: 12
Posts: 824
122.00 credits (i) (?)
If you see me with my M4: say your prayers


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: Oct 08, 2008, 02:44 PM »
AT-AT cuz it like incvinible Roll Eyes
Logged
PSN: moglet99

Please no more friend requests except C4C members, i'm running out of room!

C4C: soldior.
Uncle Achmed
Brigadier General
*
Karma: 11
Posts: 637
353.00 credits (i) (?)
GT: Uncle Achmed


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: Oct 08, 2008, 06:14 PM »
Scarab

Mark Hamil wouldn't be able to take it out with its uber blue colored cannon of death
Logged
GT: Uncle Achmed (Add me If you Like)
Playing: Halo 3, Gears of War 2,

The Real Ultimate Law:
"Its Only Noobish if it Kills You"

World at War = Treyarch's First Sucess

Cool People are Named Uncle Achmed

"All the Food Based Clubs Suck" - The People of The Food Sucks Club.
Demon APX
Global Moderator
Commander
*
Karma: 197
Posts: 1,877
17788.00 credits (i) (?)

View Profile
« Reply #4 on: Oct 08, 2008, 10:10 PM »
Scarab
Logged
*´¨)
¸.•´¸.•*´¨) ¸.•*¨)
(¸.•´ (¸.• Đemon APX

Leader; C4C 360 Division

Forum Rules

Let me or one of the other moderators know if there's anything you need.
Cattpride
Brigadier General
*
Karma: 41
Posts: 554
1603.00 credits (i) (?)
The cat does not like his AK-47 silenced...


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: Oct 10, 2008, 03:24 AM »
Scarab. Definitely.
The AT-AT looks like it could fall over easily if it is pushed or pulled by a strong force, since it has thin, long, minimally spaced out legs.
The Scarab, however, has a DEADLY arsenal, a DEADLY crew and passengers of over 10, and it looks strong and sturdy, as if something huge were to hit it at a high speed, it wouldn't fall over or flip.
 Grin
Logged
The Lime Green Rule of Call of Duty 4 That Exudes Happiness: There are no noob players getting noob kills with noob perks, weapons, or attachments.
There are only players killing whiny players with good perks, weapons, and attachments.


Missions Done on Veteran: FNG, Crew Expandable, The Coup, Blackout, Death From Above, War Pig, Shock and Awe, Aftermath

The TOTALLY RAD Club E.L.R.A.B. Ranger-Commander
YoGurT
Lt. General
***
Karma: 80
Posts: 1,001
5410.00 credits (i) (?)
XBL: x Yogurt


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: Oct 10, 2008, 01:00 PM »
Scarab is a sucktastic name though. "The Scorpion" would have been cooler.

But whenever you hear a badass name like "Imperial walker" you run and hide.
Logged
call me
YoGi

Weapon of Choice

Meet the Sniper

Go ahead, make my day
Jmadness94
Master Sergeant
*
Karma: 2
Posts: 80
656.00 credits (i) (?)
僕の彼女大好き！


View Profile WWW
« Reply #7 on: Oct 13, 2008, 03:33 PM »
Scarab's bigger
Logged
Call me J
Nevermore
Master Sergeant
*
Karma: 2
Posts: 76
622.00 credits (i) (?)
Strike Team Echo


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: Oct 14, 2008, 09:34 AM »
Scarab. Its weaponry is more advanced, and its crew is more deadly. The crews small arms alone could rip holes in the AT AT's armor.
Logged
Death Before Dishonor

Hook 'em Horns!!

"Freedom is not free, but the U.S. Marine Corps will pay most of your share." - Ned Dolan
Deer Rat
Lt. General
***
Karma: 43
Posts: 1,284
136.00 credits (i) (?)
-Sir Ratty-


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: Oct 14, 2008, 07:37 PM »
Quote from: Nevermore on Oct 14, 2008, 09:34 AM
Scarab. Its weaponry is more advanced, and its crew is more deadly. The crews small arms alone could rip holes in the AT AT's armor.
I agree, and one shot from the main cannon of a Scarab will make the AT-ATs' legs melt.
Logged
Proud to be living near Canadians, eh?

Meet The Sandvich

Capreolus Rattus

GT: Deer Rat
Clan: C4C 360 Division
Position: Officer
Dragon-ov
Staff Sergeant
*
Karma: 1
Posts: 58
472.00 credits (i) (?)

View Profile
« Reply #10 on: Oct 16, 2008, 10:59 AM »
well lets see
it took a few ropes to bring down an AT-AT
it took either one-four tanks, a high powered weapon (after infiltrating the heavy guarded machine), or a genetically enhanced super human to take the scarab down
i think i know who wins
Logged
Nevermore
Master Sergeant
*
Karma: 2
Posts: 76
622.00 credits (i) (?)
Strike Team Echo


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: Oct 17, 2008, 06:12 PM »
Quote from: Dragon-ov on Oct 16, 2008, 10:59 AM
well lets see
it took a few ropes to bring down an AT-AT
it took either one-four tanks, a high powered weapon (after infiltrating the heavy guarded machine), or a genetically enhanced super human to take the scarab down
i think i know who wins

Although this does reveal one of the scarabs greatest weaknesses: its ability to be temporarily crippled even by small arms fire and grenades.  If such a thing was so easily done to an AT-AT, it wouldn't take a super-soldier to destroy it.
Logged
Death Before Dishonor

Hook 'em Horns!!

"Freedom is not free, but the U.S. Marine Corps will pay most of your share." - Ned Dolan
briddler13
Lt. General
***
Karma: 93
Posts: 1,320
11852.00 credits (i) (?)
A True American Hero


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: Oct 17, 2008, 07:38 PM »
AT-AT v. Scarab: Both are about the smae size; the AT-AT is a lttle bit bigger. AT-AT's are weak behind its "head" (the "neck"), and by taking out its legs. The Scarab is suseptible to small arms fire. The AT-AT probably has the advantage as far as weaponry goes, but not by much. Considering the circumstances, I would say that the AT-AT would win. The AT-AT has very good armor, and could probably withstand quite a few plasma cannon blasts. The Scarab, on the other hand, will become weakened and it will lower. Fire a few blasts inside the Scarab and chalk up a win for the AT-AT. For you Halo fanboys out there: it might help your argument if you study both sides.
Logged
"It is indeed probable that more harm and misery have been caused by men determined to use coercion to stamp out a moral evil than by men intent on doing evil."-Fredrich August von Hayek
YoGurT
Lt. General
***
Karma: 80
Posts: 1,001
5410.00 credits (i) (?)
XBL: x Yogurt


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: Oct 17, 2008, 10:46 PM »
Quote from: briddler13 on Oct 17, 2008, 07:38 PM
AT-AT v. Scarab: Both are about the smae size; the AT-AT is a lttle bit bigger. AT-AT's are weak behind its "head" (the "neck"), and by taking out its legs. The Scarab is suseptible to small arms fire. The AT-AT probably has the advantage as far as weaponry goes, but not by much. Considering the circumstances, I would say that the AT-AT would win. The AT-AT has very good armor, and could probably withstand quite a few plasma cannon blasts. The Scarab, on the other hand, will become weakened and it will lower. Fire a few blasts inside the Scarab and chalk up a win for the AT-AT. For you Halo fanboys out there: it might help your argument if you study both sides.
You really have a point. But I still think that the striders in half life 2 would win.
Logged
call me
YoGi

Weapon of Choice

Meet the Sniper

Go ahead, make my day
briddler13
Lt. General
***
Karma: 93
Posts: 1,320
11852.00 credits (i) (?)
A True American Hero


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: Oct 18, 2008, 06:30 PM »
Quote from: YoGurT on Oct 17, 2008, 10:46 PM
Quote from: briddler13 on Oct 17, 2008, 07:38 PM
AT-AT v. Scarab: Both are about the smae size; the AT-AT is a lttle bit bigger. AT-AT's are weak behind its "head" (the "neck"), and by taking out its legs. The Scarab is suseptible to small arms fire. The AT-AT probably has the advantage as far as weaponry goes, but not by much. Considering the circumstances, I would say that the AT-AT would win. The AT-AT has very good armor, and could probably withstand quite a few plasma cannon blasts. The Scarab, on the other hand, will become weakened and it will lower. Fire a few blasts inside the Scarab and chalk up a win for the AT-AT. For you Halo fanboys out there: it might help your argument if you study both sides.
You really have a point. But I still think that the striders in half life 2 would win.
Hmmm........Striders. It takes approximately 7 RPGs to take out a Strider, and they are only damaged with explosives....they have very long legs, leading me to believe that they also have a weak spot in the legs. I still take the AT-AT. The AT-AT would use its dual, chin-mounted Taim & Bak MS-1 fire-linked heavy laser cannons, which are much more powerful than any RPG.
Logged
"It is indeed probable that more harm and misery have been caused by men determined to use coercion to stamp out a moral evil than by men intent on doing evil."-Fredrich August von Hayek
CoD4Central Forums
   
 Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
« previous next »
 
Jump to:  


CoD4 and Call of Duty 4 are registered trademarks of Infinity Ward.
© 2008 CoD4Central | Privacy Policy and Copyright
All submitted content becomes the property of CoD4Central. Usage of CoD4Central content on any other site is strictly prohibited.
Legal action will be taken against anyone found using copyrighted CoD4Central content elsewhere.