Forums  
CoD4Central.com

CoD4 Central Forums

Welcome guest, please login or register a free account to post on these forums. Please sign up today, and help contribute to the growing community. Registering only takes a minute and allows you to post on the forums, communicate with other members, advertise for your clan, start a new one, or look for one in our clan forums, submit classes, guides and other content, as well as many other features.
Jan 08, 2009, 01:06 PM
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: AT-AT vs. Halo Scarab  (Read 390 times)
hello im bobo
Sergeant
*
Karma: 3
Posts: 37
306.00 credits (i) (?)

View Profile
« on: Oct 04, 2008, 10:36 PM »

who would win?
Logged

Hello im hello im bobo
YoGurT
Lt. General
***
Karma: 103
Posts: 1,245
7378.00 credits (i) (?)
Nambu Warrior strikes again!!


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: Oct 05, 2008, 01:56 PM »

I think the scarab because of teh lazer b34ms.
Logged

YoGurT

Gamertag: x_Yogurt
[C4C] 360 Division ~ Officer
Want to join the C4C clan? No problemo!

C4C Rules & Regs         360  Recruitment
moglet99
Major General
**
Karma: 12
Posts: 925
6169.00 credits (i) (?)
Random....blame the dog.


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: Oct 08, 2008, 02:44 PM »

AT-AT cuz it like incvinible Roll Eyes
Logged

PSN: moglet99
COD: WaW:
KD ratio: 1.10
Kill streak: 34

C4C: soldior.
The Resident Arab
Lt. General
***
Karma: 22
Posts: 1,089
2620.00 credits (i) (?)
GT: Uncle Achmed


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: Oct 08, 2008, 06:14 PM »

Scarab

Mark Hamil wouldn't be able to take it out with its uber blue colored cannon of death
Logged

GT: Uncle Achmed (Add me If you Like)
Playing: World At War

The Real Ultimate Law:
"Its Only Noobish if it Kills You"

The Golden Rule
"Nobody Kills Rosie"

World at War = Treyarch's First Sucess

The sexiest Arab on the forums
Demon APX
Global Moderator
*
Karma: 234
Posts: 2,299
23142.00 credits (i) (?)

View Profile
« Reply #4 on: Oct 08, 2008, 10:10 PM »

Scarab
Logged


.•´¯`•._.• Demon APX •._.•´¯`•.
GT: TheSpeedDemonX
Leader; C4C 360 Division

Forum Rules |  The Official Guide to Posting and Karma

Let me or one of the other moderators know if there's anything you need.
Cattpride
Major General
**
Karma: 49
Posts: 751
3207.00 credits (i) (?)
One cool cat...


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: Oct 10, 2008, 03:24 AM »

Scarab. Definitely.
The AT-AT looks like it could fall over easily if it is pushed or pulled by a strong force, since it has thin, long, minimally spaced out legs.
The Scarab, however, has a DEADLY arsenal, a DEADLY crew and passengers of over 10, and it looks strong and sturdy, as if something huge were to hit it at a high speed, it wouldn't fall over or flip.
 Grin
Logged

Dear noobs: Please drop your M16's and stop using Martyrdom. If you continue to be such noobs, then please, do us all a favor, and go trade your CoD4 disk to Gamestop.
Sincerely, your good friend, Cattpride.


Missions Done on Veteran: FNG, Crew Expandable, The Coup, Blackout, Death From Above, War Pig, Shock and Awe, Aftermath
YoGurT
Lt. General
***
Karma: 103
Posts: 1,245
7378.00 credits (i) (?)
Nambu Warrior strikes again!!


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: Oct 10, 2008, 01:00 PM »

Scarab is a sucktastic name though. "The Scorpion" would have been cooler.

But whenever you hear a badass name like "Imperial walker" you run and hide.
Logged

YoGurT

Gamertag: x_Yogurt
[C4C] 360 Division ~ Officer
Want to join the C4C clan? No problemo!

C4C Rules & Regs         360  Recruitment
Jmadness94
Master Sergeant
*
Karma: 3
Posts: 81
664.00 credits (i) (?)
僕の彼女大好き!


View Profile WWW
« Reply #7 on: Oct 13, 2008, 03:33 PM »

Scarab's bigger
Logged

Call me J
Nevermore
Master Sergeant
*
Karma: 2
Posts: 76
622.00 credits (i) (?)
Strike Team Echo


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: Oct 14, 2008, 09:34 AM »

Scarab. Its weaponry is more advanced, and its crew is more deadly. The crews small arms alone could rip holes in the AT AT's armor.
Logged

Death Before Dishonor

Hook 'em Horns!!

"Freedom is not free, but the U.S. Marine Corps will pay most of your share." - Ned Dolan
Deer Rat
Lt. General
***
Karma: 45
Posts: 1,340
64.00 credits (i) (?)
-Sir Ratty-


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: Oct 14, 2008, 07:37 PM »

Scarab. Its weaponry is more advanced, and its crew is more deadly. The crews small arms alone could rip holes in the AT AT's armor.
I agree, and one shot from the main cannon of a Scarab will make the AT-ATs' legs melt.
Logged

New rule: No doing anything If I'm not here.

Meet The Sandvich

Capreolus Rattus

GT: Deer Rat
Clan: C4C 360 Division
Position: Officer
Dragon-ov
Staff Sergeant
*
Karma: 1
Posts: 58
472.00 credits (i) (?)

View Profile
« Reply #10 on: Oct 16, 2008, 10:59 AM »

well lets see
it took a few ropes to bring down an AT-AT
it took either one-four tanks, a high powered weapon (after infiltrating the heavy guarded machine), or a genetically enhanced super human to take the scarab down
i think i know who wins
Logged
Nevermore
Master Sergeant
*
Karma: 2
Posts: 76
622.00 credits (i) (?)
Strike Team Echo


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: Oct 17, 2008, 06:12 PM »

well lets see
it took a few ropes to bring down an AT-AT
it took either one-four tanks, a high powered weapon (after infiltrating the heavy guarded machine), or a genetically enhanced super human to take the scarab down
i think i know who wins

Although this does reveal one of the scarabs greatest weaknesses: its ability to be temporarily crippled even by small arms fire and grenades.  If such a thing was so easily done to an AT-AT, it wouldn't take a super-soldier to destroy it.
Logged

Death Before Dishonor

Hook 'em Horns!!

"Freedom is not free, but the U.S. Marine Corps will pay most of your share." - Ned Dolan
briddler13
General
****
Karma: 132
Posts: 1,644
14229.00 credits (i) (?)
BRiddler13's Stoßtruppen


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: Oct 17, 2008, 07:38 PM »

AT-AT v. Scarab: Both are about the smae size; the AT-AT is a lttle bit bigger. AT-AT's are weak behind its "head" (the "neck"), and by taking out its legs. The Scarab is suseptible to small arms fire. The AT-AT probably has the advantage as far as weaponry goes, but not by much. Considering the circumstances, I would say that the AT-AT would win. The AT-AT has very good armor, and could probably withstand quite a few plasma cannon blasts. The Scarab, on the other hand, will become weakened and it will lower. Fire a few blasts inside the Scarab and chalk up a win for the AT-AT. For you Halo fanboys out there: it might help your argument if you study both sides.
Logged

GT: BRiddler13
C4C 360 Division Co-Leader, Head of North and South American operations
The only hope you have is to accept the fact that you're already dead. The sooner you accept that, the sooner you'll be able to function as a soldier is supposed to function: without mercy, without compassion, without remorse. All war depends upon it.

"...You're so smart..., oh godly Brad..." - Demon APX
YoGurT
Lt. General
***
Karma: 103
Posts: 1,245
7378.00 credits (i) (?)
Nambu Warrior strikes again!!


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: Oct 17, 2008, 10:46 PM »

AT-AT v. Scarab: Both are about the smae size; the AT-AT is a lttle bit bigger. AT-AT's are weak behind its "head" (the "neck"), and by taking out its legs. The Scarab is suseptible to small arms fire. The AT-AT probably has the advantage as far as weaponry goes, but not by much. Considering the circumstances, I would say that the AT-AT would win. The AT-AT has very good armor, and could probably withstand quite a few plasma cannon blasts. The Scarab, on the other hand, will become weakened and it will lower. Fire a few blasts inside the Scarab and chalk up a win for the AT-AT. For you Halo fanboys out there: it might help your argument if you study both sides.
You really have a point. But I still think that the striders in half life 2 would win.
Logged

YoGurT

Gamertag: x_Yogurt
[C4C] 360 Division ~ Officer
Want to join the C4C clan? No problemo!

C4C Rules & Regs         360  Recruitment
briddler13
General
****
Karma: 132
Posts: 1,644
14229.00 credits (i) (?)
BRiddler13's Stoßtruppen


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: Oct 18, 2008, 06:30 PM »

AT-AT v. Scarab: Both are about the smae size; the AT-AT is a lttle bit bigger. AT-AT's are weak behind its "head" (the "neck"), and by taking out its legs. The Scarab is suseptible to small arms fire. The AT-AT probably has the advantage as far as weaponry goes, but not by much. Considering the circumstances, I would say that the AT-AT would win. The AT-AT has very good armor, and could probably withstand quite a few plasma cannon blasts. The Scarab, on the other hand, will become weakened and it will lower. Fire a few blasts inside the Scarab and chalk up a win for the AT-AT. For you Halo fanboys out there: it might help your argument if you study both sides.
You really have a point. But I still think that the striders in half life 2 would win.
Hmmm........Striders. It takes approximately 7 RPGs to take out a Strider, and they are only damaged with explosives....they have very long legs, leading me to believe that they also have a weak spot in the legs. I still take the AT-AT. The AT-AT would use its dual, chin-mounted Taim & Bak MS-1 fire-linked heavy laser cannons, which are much more powerful than any RPG.
Logged

GT: BRiddler13
C4C 360 Division Co-Leader, Head of North and South American operations
The only hope you have is to accept the fact that you're already dead. The sooner you accept that, the sooner you'll be able to function as a soldier is supposed to function: without mercy, without compassion, without remorse. All war depends upon it.

"...You're so smart..., oh godly Brad..." - Demon APX
CoD4Central Forums
   

 Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


CoD4 and Call of Duty 4 are registered trademarks of Infinity Ward.
© 2008 CoD4Central | Privacy Policy and Copyright
All submitted content becomes the property of CoD4Central. Usage of CoD4Central content on any other site is strictly prohibited.
Legal action will be taken against anyone found using copyrighted CoD4Central content elsewhere.