Physics and stuff...

[h.a.d.o]

can you tell me the speed of dark? lol
i have lots of random  questions
Even tho there is no such thing as the speed of dark but i guess u can answer it lol


This topic has been split. Carry on here.

[briddler13]

^ dark does not have speed

[DestroManiak]

^ dark does not have speed

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS DARKNESS

OMFG what are you being thaught at school HUH!!!!!!

BTW the speed of "dark" of your mind is equal to speed of light...

[briddler13]

^ dark does not have speed

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS DARKNESS

THAT IS WHY I SAID IT DIDN'T HAVE SPEED!!!!

BTW the speed of "dark" of your mind is equal to speed of light...

No it isn't. You cannot measure something that doesn't exist can you? Measuring the speed of darkness would be compareable to trying to measure the speed of silence.........you can't by the way.

[MrCynical]

Correct, darkness is in it's nature, lack of, or absence of light. Nothing more.

[DestroManiak]

^ dark does not have speed

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS DARKNESS

THAT IS WHY I SAID IT DIDN'T HAVE SPEED!!!!

BTW the speed of "dark" of your mind is equal to speed of light...

No it isn't. You cannot measure something that doesn't exist can you? Measuring the speed of darkness would be compareable to trying to measure the speed of silence.........you can't by the way.

I said "darkness that you think about in your mind"

So making clear the "speeed of darkness is equal to light"
I ment "light retreating speed is equal to light speed IN AIR
(light speed we know of is lights speed in NOTHIN in air light moves slower so:
Light speed is inversed ratio by Mass/Volume)

So I said that "the speed of dark OF YOUR MIND" (not yours briddler, wtf you are briddler  I DIDNT knew you changed your avatar D)

BUT it doesnt changes the fact that the answer of his question is its equal to light speed
Because as darkness is light not being existed
He ment "speed light retreating" by saying "speed of dark"

SO lets ask another rondom question and LETS GET SCIENCED

next one from me: (I know the answer but I just want you to answer)
IF the super glue sticks everything WHY cant it stick the two sides of the tube
If dolphins are the perfect swimmers, does that mean fat men are the perfect swimmers among the mankind?

[Vancha]

You two are being stupid. You're both making the same point and somehow arguing about it.

Anyway...onto Destro's questions...

It's the exposure to the air that dries glue. Leave the lid or whatever off your glue tube and it'll go dry.

Dolphins are good swimmers because of the way they're shaped and move, fat men are shaped the worst for swimming quickly...why would you even ask that?

[DestroManiak]

You two are being stupid. You're both making the same point and somehow arguing about it.

Anyway...onto Destro's questions...

It's the exposure to the air that dries glue. Leave the lid or whatever off your glue tube and it'll go dry.

Dolphins are good swimmers because of the way they're shaped and move, fat men are shaped the worst for swimming quickly...why would you even ask that?

well as once in discovery channel the dude said that the fat of dolphin makes the swim easier and swifter

btw you know that I know the answers, I just asked for this thread to go on

so next rondom questsion :
dammit nothing comes to my mind

[RRjohn]

If you think about it darkness is pretty odd. It doesn't exist yet you can't see though it.

Also, light is invisible. Although the reason should be pretty obvious.

[DestroManiak]

If you think about it darkness is pretty odd. It doesn't exist yet you can't see though it.

Also, light is invisible. Although the reason should be pretty obvious.

Epic failure... (j/k no offence )

First of all its not that you "CANT SEE THROUGH" if you are in a dark(this is a correct usage) living room, I mean TOTALLY dark, but the kitchent is lightened, you CAN see the kitchen WHICH proves that you can actualy "see through the absence or light"

The white light is made of the colors that are in rainbow
Every object reflects some part of it
Objects that reflect everyone of them are the ones we see white
and object which absorbe every one of them are which ones we see black
AND our eyes detect light which is reflected from objects to see things
Which means actually every vision we are seeing -the image of your monitor while you read this text- IS NOT the monitor itself
ITS ONLY THE LIGHT THAT IS REFLECTED FROM IT!!!

hope you are enlighten

[RRjohn]

I'm not stupid Destro, I know all those things.

I didn't specify what conditions I meant did I. If you are in total blackness you cannot see through it unless you can see a source of light.


I remember actually that scientifically it is only possible to have a reduced amount of light, not a complete absence of it.

[MrCynical]

WHICH proves that you can actualy "see through the absence or light"

That is incorrect, you cannot see through an absence of light. You're eyes are light sensory organs, if there is no light whatsoever for them to detect, you cannot see. It is as simple as that.

Which means actually every vision we are seeing -the image of your monitor while you read this text- IS NOT the monitor itself
ITS ONLY THE LIGHT THAT IS REFLECTED FROM IT!!!

That's not entirely true. But I know where you are coming from in that we don't see anything 'properly' as we just see the light that is reflected/given off.
Our eyes cannot see light itself, but can detect it in two ways. We can see things that reflect the light back into our eyes, such as everything around us during the day, or from the source itself, eg, fire, distant stars, or your television/moniter. You are seeing the moniter itself as it is a source of light.

[RRjohn]

Cyn's hit the nail on the head there, +k for sort of agreeing .

[DestroManiak]

I'm not stupid Destro, I know all those things.

I didn't specify what conditions I meant did I. If you are in total blackness you cannot see through it unless you can see a source of light.


I remember actually that scientifically it is only possible to have a reduced amount of light, not a complete absence of it.

do you mean compleate absence by the "range of spectrum that human eye cannot detect" because the range of light that a human eye can detect is only A VERY SMALL PART



everything else than the color being squized there is undetectable by human eye, but as we talk about the "Human eye seeing through the dark" the other kinds of light arent in our busines

BUT after all IS possible to create totally LIGHTLESS room
But its like making a room thats doesnt contain anything (nor air total emptyness, now I dont want another debate of "emptyness doesnt exist its absence of molecules" )
But much harder because radio waves can penatrate

you CAN have complete absence of it *although the senerio that I stated on my previus post wasnt compleate absence because there actually was a source in kitchen
But as I said its not that you cannot "SEE THROUGH" the dark, its just because THERE IS NOTHING TO SEE

Despite common beleif you dont see the object, you see the LIGHT being replected by it and as there "is no light to be reflected" that proves "there is NOTHING to see"

WHICH proves that you can actualy "see through the absence or light"

That is incorrect, you cannot see through an absence of light. You're eyes are light sensory organs, if there is no light whatsoever for them to detect, you cannot see. It is as simple as that.

Which means actually every vision we are seeing -the image of your monitor while you read this text- IS NOT the monitor itself
ITS ONLY THE LIGHT THAT IS REFLECTED FROM IT!!!

That's not entirely true. But I know where you are coming from in that we don't see anything 'properly' as we just see the light that is reflected/given off.
Our eyes cannot see light itself, but can detect it in two ways. We can see things that reflect the light back into our eyes, such as everything around us during the day, or from the source itself, eg, fire, distant stars, or your television/moniter. You are seeing the moniter itself as it is a source of light.

OHH SORRY CYN
I wasnt clear enough with that monitor thing
I really am, I actually ment the monitors borders around it,
OR LETS JUST SAY TURNED OFF MONITOR (I have caps on cause I want to make it clear)
I dont mean monitor as "the source"
I just ment the monitor as object, imagine it turned off, and you see the "black" on the place you are seeing images

So actually "cannot seeing THROUGH darkness" is not ... I donno what should be said
I mean in "darkness" there is NOTHING to be seen as we see light itself(thank you cyn for realising me of that) or light reflacting from an object and AS we dont have any light at all there is NOTHING to see

[MrCynical]

Lol I'm just stating the facts in this very confusing conversation. I have no idea if we are in agreement or not due to your slightly erratic typing but that's fine, makes it interesting.

Btw I've split this as it got horribly off topic.